![]() Maybe it depends on the device or on some setting or. Thus (my 2 cts), 2.4 is simply not yet recommendable because it's not stable enough. My experience? I used 2.4 last week on a +200 km trip and I can say that (with the exception of a crash choosing a POI (parking) near my destination) 2.4 performed very well. Important may be that a truck driver posted that despite the repeated crashes he experienced (!!) he still prefers 2.4 for the better truck (and thus likewise vehicles) routing. A settings button in a different screen, the possibility to choose between POI sets (by maker) and possible some minor other changes. First, the real difference with 2.0 is not that important. Maybe the so called 2.4 is too? About 2.4: I have tested 2.4 and I can say a few things about it. The newer ones are adaptions to specific devices. Know that newer 2.0 builds are available, but those builds do not include really new features or improvements. There is a torrent link in the program section. In fact, I suggest that you - for now - stick to Yurbuhs excellent and stable Primo 2.0.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |